This page has been designed to support Working Group
4 of RTCA SC-186. This group is currently maintaing the Airborne Surveillance Applications (ASA) Minimum Aviation System
Performance Standards (MASPS). This group is also chartered
with developing the technical requirements for ADS-B applications
that have had a detailed Concept of Operation developed within Working
Group 1 and approved by the RTCA SC-186 Plenary.
For more information on the group's activities contact
the group co- chair, Don Walker of Honeywell
<don.walker@honeywell.com >.
Problem of Surface Vehicles which operate
on in tunnels under runways and taxiways. How do
Aircraft track these vehicles without placing them on the
runways or taxiways?
Since there is no means on the receive side
to determine if transmitting DO-260 compliant systems are also
TSO C166 compliant, integrity must be assumed to be ZERO for
received data.
NIC & NAC values of 9 or greater are
defined with vertical considerations. Since initial STP
MOPS will not address these factors, ASSAP must not use values
greater than 8 for these fields.
The proposed
appendix provides information on how CDTI symbol
requirements were determined through studies, expert
opinion, and existing systems. It was prompted by the
inability to locate such information on existing TCAS
symbols. The appendix information should be helpful when
re-examining display requirements for future versions or
systems.
Current Traffic
Application descriptions do not consider what happens when a
TCAS (ACAS) Traffic Alert (TA) or Resolution Advisory (RA)
happens – the same holds for other ASAS alerts that may be
generated by/for other applications. The ASAS MOPS does not
specify what should happen when a TA/RA occurs when traffic
is Selected or Coupled. This is currently left undefined in
the ASAS MOPS (see appendix G., section G.6).